OPAR's second annual state-level legislative analysis on science and technology legislation introduced and enacted in the 2009 session.
This document briefly summarizes findings of OPAR?s Science and Technology (S&T) Policy Infrastructure Project. This research focuses on state level policy mechanisms that address science and technology issues.
OPAR's 2009 Science and Technology Policy Reviews features briefings on state-level legislative activity for smart grid, cloud computing, digital media and STEM education as it relates to the workforce.
This paper was presented at the Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy (October 2-3, 2009) in Atlanta, Georgia. The Science and Technology Legislative Landscape is a concerted effort to catalog S&T bills introduced and/or enacted in all fifty states. By informing state-level policymakers of na-tionwide trends in S&T policy, OPAR aims to elevate the discussion of science and technology issues with policymakers.
This document reflects a listing of how Georgia ranks on severaldemographic, economic and workforce indicators. It is a living document and will be updated regularly.
This table is an inventory of three tools used to stimulate science and techology from a state government level. For each state, the table reflects the presence or absence of the following: science advisor, S&T advisory council, stratewide strategic plan that incldues the role of S&T, and S&T committees in the state's legislative body. Green indicates the presence of the tool, red indicates the absence of the tool, and yellow indicates the information could not be confirmed. This research is ongoing. We welcome input and corrections to the data. Please email Marlit Hayslett at marlit.hayslett@gtri.gatech.edu.
This table is an inventory of three tools used to stimulate science and techology from a state government level. For each state, the table reflects the presence or absence of the following: science advisor, S&T advisory council, stratewide strategic plan that incldues the role of S&T, and S&T committees in the state's legislative body. Green indicates the presence of the tool, red indicates the absence of the tool, and yellow indicates the information could not be confirmed. This research is ongoing. We welcome input and corrections to the data. Please email Marlit Hayslett at marlit.hayslett@gtri.gatech.edu.
This table is an inventory of four tools used to stimulate science and techology from a state government level. For each state, the table reflects the presence or absence of the following: science advisor, S&T advisory council, statewide strategic plan that includes the role of S&T, and S&T committees in the state's legislative body. This research is ongoing. We welcome input and corrections to the data. Please email Marlit Hayslett at marlit.hayslett@gtri.gatech.edu.
How does the use of virtual worlds influence current educational initiatives, especially within science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields.
Preliminary results, presented at the 3rd Annual OPAR Legislative Roundtable, from the Science and Technology Legislative Landscape project. The states that were analyzed were Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
A look at the legislative activity surrounding biotechnology in the state of Georgia.
An overview of the community wireless initiatives and projects currently within Georgia.
A state-level analysis of legislative activity surrounding innovation.
A brief look at renewable energy portfolio standards throughout the United States.
This document briefly summarizes findings of Phase 1 of OPAR's Science and Technology Legislative Landscape Project. This research focuses on state level legislation in the US that addresses science and technology issues.
This is a one-page at-a-glance view of the Technology to Policy (T2P) Methodology. This research is in development so this model is regulary updated to reflect new findings.
Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel?s office funded a research study conducted by the Georgia Institute of Technology to better understand the threats and their potential impact on the secure conduct of elections. The focus of this study was on the real-time elections environment, including the procedures and processes related to the use of electronic machines and the effectiveness of such procedures in mitigating the known technical threats.
The evaluation report presents a valuable assessment of the challenges OPAR encountered in testing the The Carter Center's methodology to observe the electronic voting system in the state of Georgia.
This poster was presented at the Atlanta Conference on Science and Technology Policy in Oct 2007.
OPAR seeks student interns each academic semester. Ideal candidates will balance technical skills with an interest in public policy. Continue...